top of page

Alignment Gateway (Ji+Je): Noumenal-Phenomenal Reconciliation and Dialectical Unity

Preliminary Notice: Ongoing Research Disclosure

Dear Readers,

I would like to extend a warm welcome and a note of appreciation for your interest in this article. Before delving into the content, it’s important to highlight that what you are about to read is a work in progress. This article represents a phase of ongoing research and analysis, and as such, it contains preliminary findings and hypotheses that are subject to further validation and refinement. As the research progresses, additional data and more comprehensive analyses will be integrated to enhance the robustness and depth of the conclusions drawn herein. The current version primarily aims to share initial insights, foster discussion, and invite constructive feedback, which is invaluable for the evolution of this research. Please note that some sections may appear less developed or conclusive at this stage. These are areas where further investigation is underway, and I anticipate that subsequent versions of this article will provide more definitive information and a richer discussion on these topics. Your understanding and engagement are immensely appreciated as this work continues to evolve. I look forward to presenting a more comprehensive and polished version in the future, enriched by the insights and contributions of our community.

Thank you for your interest and your patience with this evolving work.


At the crossroads of the Alignment Cognitive Gateway, the dialectical interplay between Ji's introspective evaluations and Je's external orchestrations becomes evident. Here, the internal essence of the self - marked by deeply-held axioms, beliefs, and values - does not exist in isolation but continuously engages in a dialogue with the broader, causality-driven rational structures of the external world. This dialectical tension forms the bedrock of this cognitive realm. Ji, in its search for universal principles, acts as the evaluative agent, ceaselessly engaging in self-scrutiny, ensuring congruence, authenticity, and consistency. Meanwhile, Je embodies the spirit of practical reason, a manifestation of the thesis confronting its antithesis, striving to reconcile the internal essence of the individual with the logical demands of the external realm. Within this Gateway, synthesis emerges, neither purely introspective nor solely pragmatic, but a higher-order unity. It seeks to bridge the noumenal self with the phenomenal world, uniting pure reason and practical reason in a harmonious dance of understanding. For those navigating this cognitive terrain, the questions are manifold and profound: "What is my essence?" evolves into  "How does my essence find agency and purpose within the broader structures of the world?"


The Alignment Gateway encompasses four distinct cognitive modalities: Conducting-Alignment, Revision-Alignment, Interaction-Alignment, and Analysis-Alignment. In this context, a Gateway operates as the bridge between the various combinations of mode conjunctions. They structure the meeting point of two modes, managing the inherent tension of opposites, when a third element is introduced and the psyche becomes multi-modal in advanced developmental phases. This integration amplifies the collective strengths of individual cognitive modes, resulting in an enriched cognitive system marked by enhanced dynamics and balance.

Perception, in the context of Alignment, serves as the Gateway's sensory apparatus, continuously scanning the external world and comparing its findings with the deeply-held axioms, beliefs, and values of Ji. When individuals encounter stimuli that confirm or challenge their established understanding, they're faced with a critical decision: to accept and integrate or to question and refine. Experience, thus, plays a pivotal role. Every external stimulus either aligns with or contradicts an individual's rational orientation. When there's congruence, the self finds peace in the phenomenal world. However, discrepancies disrupt this equilibrium. Such discordance acts as a feedback mechanism, flagging these inconsistencies and urging individuals to seek clarity, pose questions, or even voice their perspectives. It's here that the dialectical dance manifests, with Ji and Je engaging in a back-and-forth negotiation, aiming for harmony.

In studying the Alignment Gateway, I've observed an equitable distribution between male and female participants. Intriguingly, women who naturally lean towards the Thinking function often achieve harmonization through this integration, aligning significantly with their Feeling counterpart. Likewise, males inclined towards Feeling tend to develop in alignment with their Thinking counterpart. Although this observation is based on a small sample size, it appears that individuals who successfully integrate Alignment often had childhoods which made it challenging for them to understand or relate to the structures imposed on them. Regardless of their type, these individuals tend to gravitate towards a rational perspective, necessitating the harmonization of both judgment attitudes. From my observations, I have noted distinct behaviors attributable to the Alignment preference in individuals. Inherently, Alignment emphasizes the importance of transparency in communication and adept management of perceptions, regardless of whether Feeling predominates. Individuals with this preference demonstrate an intolerance for ambiguity, making concerted efforts to address and neutralize any inconsistencies that arise. This involves checking in with others, paying close attention to interpersonal dynamics, mitigating conflicts, and mediating when necessary. Often, they take the lead, particularly when Je is dominant, or act as a stabilizing force in various contexts with a dominant Ji. Furthermore, they remain acutely aware of their standing—whether it be social, political, academic, or otherwise—and consistently act in ways that emphasize their value within collective structures. This behavior appears to stem from an underlying fear of ridicule, which often leads to a pronounced sense of accountability and commitment observable in these individuals.

The Alignment preference, while fundamentally rooted in the pursuit of coherence and balance between internal values and external realities, can indeed manifest in darker, more problematic ways. One such manifestation is the tendency towards polarization and mental rigidity. This arises when the cognitive drive for consistency and congruence becomes inflexible and intolerant of differing viewpoints. In academic and social contexts, this can lead to dogmatic adherence to certain beliefs or ideologies, using the framework to rigidly justify these stances. The danger here lies in the potential misuse of societal structures, including religion, as vehicles to rationalize and reinforce prejudices. The cognitive strengths of Alignment, intended for reconciliation and unity, can paradoxically become instruments of division and exclusion.

Moreover, a subtler yet equally concerning aspect of this preference manifests in a form of peacekeeping where neutrality is overly prioritized, sometimes at the expense of justice or individual well-being. In such scenarios, the Alignment individual may avoid taking sides in a conflict, less out of a genuine pursuit of fairness and more as a strategy to maintain a façade of harmony. This emphasis on "keeping up appearances" often serves to project an image of impartiality and balance, even when such a stance contributes to the perpetuation of unjust or harmful status quos. In extreme cases, this approach can evolve into a willingness to sacrifice individual needs and rights in service to an overarching, and at times misguided, notion of peace. This behavior, while outwardly appearing conciliatory, can have detrimental effects: it suppresses the necessary confrontations and discussions that are essential for true resolution and progress, often allowing systemic issues to persist unchallenged.


Manifestations of the Alignment Gateway in Popular Culture: Ethical Dilemmas in Literature and Film: Within this conceptual framework, the domain of literature and film emerges as a rich repository of examples that embody the complexities inherent in the Alignment Gateway. Characters such as Atticus Finch in Harper Lee's 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and Jean Valjean in Victor Hugo's 'Les Misérables' serve as quintessential representations of the internal ethical conflict set against a backdrop of external societal pressures. Similarly, film narratives like 'The Matrix,' 'Kingdom of Heaven,' and 'Schindler’s List' extend this exploration, accentuating the protagonists' journey through ethical quandaries within broader societal contexts. These narratives not only mirror the theoretical aspects of the Alignment Gateway but also bring them to life, offering tangible manifestations of the balance between personal ethos and external demands.


Clinical Definitions: Mode: Within cognitive structures, a mode represents the synthesis of two distinct cognitive functions. This union yields a unique modality, characterized by the interplay and mutual enhancement of its constituent elements. Examples include the introspective-temporal fusion of Analysis, the spatial-temporal meld of the Cognizance Gateway, and the internal-external dialectic of the Alignment Gateway. Of note, there are six recognized dyadic configurations, each underscoring the depth and versatility inherent in cognitive convergence. Alignment Gateway: Fundamentally, this Gateway facilitates individuals in discerning the loci and rationales of their congruence or incongruence (Ji) with external protocols or structures (Je), and directs them toward aligning correspondingly with these standards. Perception is instrumental in engendering a dynamic equilibrium, allowing for a calibration of judgment protocols in response to situational exigencies.

Accessible: Alignment is a cognitive process characterized by the dynamic interplay between Introverted Judgment (Ji) and Extroverted Judgment (Je), emphasizing the balance between subjective understanding and objective standards. Ji concentrates on an individual's subjective understanding and decision-making, while Je addresses object-oriented interactions in the external world, adhering to established protocols and standards. In essence, this mode helps individuals comprehend where and why they do or do not fit (Ji) into external protocols or structures (Je) and guides them in aligning themselves appropriately with these standards. Thus, perception plays a vital role in establishing a dynamic equilibrium that enables individuals to adapt their judgment protocols according to situational demands.

All content on this site, authored by Jason Fillion or guest contributors, is protected intellectual property. We kindly request that any external use or reproduction of our content be duly credited. Your cooperation and respect for our work is greatly appreciated.

I would also like to extend my gratitude to Brittany H., Danny T., and Nick M. for sharing their personal experiences and insights regarding Alignment as an integrated mode. Although they did not contribute directly to the writing of this paper, their practical perspectives were invaluable in enhancing my understanding and approach to the subject.

bottom of page